Olympic sports free for all
Olympics 3 Comments »While there’s always plenty of chat about what games should be given the royal boot from the Olympics what’s interesting this time round are the lobbies to get some new sports into the Games.
The lobby to get Twenty20 cricket into the Games has already begun. This is shortest, simplest form of cricket, a fledgling format that still has that new car smell. It was created with dollars in mind not athleticism, for the big hits rather than the long stubborn innings. A game which is about having less cricket and more of the ‘fun stuff’ to get non-cricket people to watch it. This is the form they want in the Olympics.
A recent report has called on the IRB to try and get Rugby Sevens into the 2016 Games. Apparently when this was attempted last time it got fewer votes than roller sports.
Both campaigns have their points. Sevens rugby have a global circuit, a world cup that from next year will have a women’s competition with strong teams from Fiji, New Zealand, South Africa, Argentina, Australia and the ‘home nations.’ Similarly cricket has strong teams from around the world; from Oceania, Africa, Europe (well England), the Caribbean and the subcontinent.
But do we really want to see Rugby 7s and Twenty20 cricket in the Games?
The Olympics give the smaller sports their day in the sun and the athletes that compete in them to extend the cliché, their 15 minutes of fame. Two weeks out of every four years we’ll switch on and watch judo, diving, archery, track and field. Even for sports with a higher profile in Australia like swimming, it is still the event for those athletes.
The rest of the time we can think about our footy, tennis, cricket or golf.
Cricket and rugby stars play in front of big crowds and are house hold names already, they have their competitions and most of them have plenty of money.
One of the requisite for gaining Olympic entry must be that the Olympics will be the pinnacle for that sport.
By this definition football and tennis wouldn’t be in the Games - they should be booted out.
The majority of athletes in the majority of Olympic sports try their guts out just to have the right to go to the games. So when multimillionaire tennis stars decide whether they can fit the Olympics in their schedule and what impact it’ll have on their preparation for the next major it creates a huge imbalance.
What does it say when Harry Kewell says he wants to play at the Olympics but decides against it because he joined a new Turkish club and that’s the priority?
The amateur games may be over and the Olympics may be getting overly political and marred by drugs and other scandals. But the Olympics are still a magical sporting event with athletes from basically every nation, who for that very brief time, have the eyes of the world upon them. Why take that away? Why take that away by adding already well-followed sports like rugby and cricket?
Recent Comments