Wally the Fly

For many a year The Sideline Eye and most diehard rugby fans have been screaming for Argentina to be brought into professional competition.

The screams turned into roars from anyone familiar with the Argentine story after the Pumas made history with a 3^rd place finish at the 2007 Rugby World Cup in France.

But a quick history lesson from Professor Fly: Argentina’s rugby body UAR has up until very very recently stubbornly resisted following the rest of the 1^st World rugby nations in turning professional. Therefore all professional Argentine players (many of whom are world class) ply their trade in Europe.

The UAR asked to be part of an expanded Six nations for this very reason.

He shoots… REJECTED.

This week SANZAR have invited Argentina to join the Tri-Nations from 2012 onwards.

This is massive news, and were the typical rugby fan not taken with their skim latte and reading the news in the local broadsheet would be dancing in the street at the announcement.

But why or why is it such a big deal?

It’s massive because here you have a country that has a strong middle class rugby union following that could be very competitive but due to the fact the players are usually all together once every four years at World Cup time often haven’t been able to show how good they are (2007 being the year they did and the rest of us were happily gob smacked).

It’s a massive deal because although rugby has several competitive nations the more competitive nations there are, the more interesting Test matches and World Cups are. We need Argentina to be capable of being one of the teams that can hoist the William Web Ellis trophy aloft.

It’s important because this is to borrow the old colonialist phrase, rugby wants its place in the sun; it’s a stake in South America.

From a SA, Aust and NZ perspective its great because instead of the ridiculous schedule of playing each time three times every year, which loses the interest of even the most ardent supporter, they’ll be playing each team twice. This will keeps things interesting: less is sometimes more.

Also, as Scrum.com put it, it will: “Add fresh impetus in the form of the Pumas, who bring a healthy dose of passion and their own individual approach to the game, and you have an exciting new element that is sure to attract broadcasters. Throw in an energised group of fans, yet more colourful destinations and the exposure to a whole new TV audience and there is further cause for celebration.”

Damn right.

It’s been pointed out that SANZAR have set some tough conditions for the Argies to be included such as making them promise that all their best players be available and proving they have financial support and broadcasters onside.

It’s fair enough; it won’t be worthwhile unless the best of the best are playing.

The Argentine television audience is one boost for SANZAR (or will it soon be SAANZAR) but also the fact it’s in the right time zone to showcase the game to the massive US/Canadian market.

So let’s get the Argies into the Super 14/15 as soon as possible, especially for the likely Victorian side. Let’s make sure that any contracts signed in the Northern Hemisphere expressly states that they can play for the season except in August/September.

This is a great leap forward for the game. Rejoice!

Robbie ‘Dingo’ Deans has fast become the sacred cow of Australian rugby.

After years in the football wilderness Aussie rah-rah fans were desperate for a change in fortune…and still are.

Fans, including yours truly were excited by the prospect of the Wallabies playing Crusaders style football; counter-attack, fast and mobile forwards and ball in hand ‘play what’s in front of you’ style of footy.

Now Australia have lost two games on the trot the halo on Dingo’s head has taken a few beatings. What’s fascinating is the fact that many in the rugby media are drawing swords at the very thought of criticising this guy.

Truth is Dingo has improved the Wallabies no doubt; the scrum is beginning to hold its own instead of being an international joke and perhaps most importantly with sideways glances to 2011 has brought in around a dozen debutants and given the Wallaby side a flash of youth.

But it is fair to say that Dingo has made mistakes when it comes to the style of players and play he is trying to instil. The idea of three openside flankers in Smith, Pocock and Waugh might sound great to ex-full-backs like Deans and plenty of other sports fans but it doesn’t  equate to the toughness you need in a backrow.

Look at South Africa who have a brutal backrow of Berger, Spies and Smith and now looking even more devastating with a genuine ‘fetcher’ (openside flanker for the rest of us) in Brussow.

Australia have been smashed at the breakdown in both games and have seriously lacked the physicality need to win against the best teams in the world.

And the fact we went against the best lineout in the world the other week without a recognised third jumper in the starting side? Let’s not even go there (ok but just for a second, we lost 8 throws to the Yarpies).

And just while we’re on changes that need to be happening in the Aussie side…

• Barnes proved against the Springboks when Gits was yellow carded that he has the pose, tactical kicking nouse, composure and ability to control the game that you need in a good and reliable first five-eigth. This Fly has been calling for Barnes and Gits to swap the 10 and 12 jerseys for a year. After the South Africa game the small voices saying the same have gained a proper voice.
• Mortlock has a doubtful future. Hard to say for a captain but his play is essential bash and barge and the older he gets the less effective he is. Mortlock is a great player and produces excellent performances that have won Australia and the ACT many games, but the gap between those games are growing. Adam Ashley-Cooper (as has been written here before) is a better outside centre than winger or full-back (although he’s more than accomplished in both) and O’Connor’s counter-attacks from full back the other week against the Yarpies shows he’s ready for a regular starting spot at 15.
• Genia deserved to start. Burgess has had more than enough chances and hasn’t produced the goods. Dingo has showed him a hell of a lot of loyalty but unlike last year we have a young replacement in Genia not a bloke about to retire in Cordingly. If Burgess really is the bloke to take us to the 2011 and let’s hope he is, then being dropped should fire him up and spur him to be a better player…worked for most of our best cricketers…
• The backrow selection for tomorrow nights game were correct; Elsom (no pressure on him at all…), Brown and Smith. Ultimately if Palu picks up some form in club rugby he should be considered a 20 minute impact player and should be touted as the man to replace Brown at about the 60 minute mark.
• Horwill is a player that the Fly rates very highly but whose form hasn’t matched last year’s high yet. We need him to shine while we just have to hope and pray that Dan Vickerman returns in time for the world cup as nobody else really selects themselves.
• Baxter has improved out of sight since Dingo took hold but Alexander deserve to be starting. While Moore’s inclusion of Palautu-Nau is purely due to the latter’s poor lineout throwing. The fact Moore threw so poorly the other week means a change here should also be looked at. 

THE SOCCEROOS should take a bow. We have for the first time ever qualified for two successive world cups. It has been an extraordinary achievement. Thank goodness we no longer have to endure the heartwrenching last ditch qualifing games anymore (Iran circa 97, Uruguay circa 01, 05). The move into Asia has meant the team gets to play regular matches together against better opposition and place in the World Cup finals determined by a host of matches from cold Sydney nights at the Olympic Stadium to blistering desert conditions in the Middle East rather than a one-off home and away leg. the move has meant more important games at home and literally millions of dollars extra for the national body.

LOTE TUQIRI shock, horror has been left out two weeks in a row from the Wallabies squad showing a) Dingo Deans doesn’t give a Kiwi bird’s arse how much he’s being paid and b) in all honesty there are better contenders for wing spots that Lote.

 On the subject of players being left out the Tele ran a story last week about Lote and Timana playing club rugby. In this morn’s Herald mentions how Phil Waugh is one of five members of the Wallabies squad and one of 40 Super rugby players running around for their clubs today. Hmmm, can you imagine that instead of these players going to club rugby they were going to a smaller, higher level competition? Wouldn’t it be fantastic to see these guys playing with and against each other while the Test season played out? Instead of some players here and there as well as a few playing in Brissy and Perth comps. Another argument for our national club comp Mr O’Neill.

 THE WALLABIES while they aren’t going to South Africa next year (well they are but not for soccer) they’re performance last week was one of the best season openers in a long while. Gits and Barnes operating as first and second five-eighths makes Australia that much better and their tactical kicking was spot on. O’Connor is truly a freakish talent and alongside Lachie Turner will electrify our backline play. Add in a few injuried forwards and we have a decent shot at the Tri-Nations.

Huzzah! Pinch yourself. Pigs are flying (swine flu, geddit).

Yes John O’Neill was reported in The Australian as saying that a good broadcast deal for the new Super 15 tournament could mean Australia can get a national club competition up and running again.

The Saviour reckons that this time it needs to be done on the smell of an oily rag (the one and only Australian Rugby Championship (ARC) in 2007 lost $4.7 million bucks. So oily rag is probably a fair call. There were a few things that massively added to the cost of the ARC; the fact the ARU paid the ABC to show it, costs of flying to Perth, setting up a Melbourne side with no real existing rugby infrastructure (no Super franchise or Premier club rugby ‘feeder’ teams like in Sydney and Brissy), and of course general flights and accomodation.

The general murmurs around rugby circles is that a new ARC should disclude any Perth team to save cash. While it will save some dough it would be a step back for developing support in Perth and a kick in the teeth for Perth rugby fans. Rugby has made some headway there with a Test every year and a Super franchise, chopping them out of a new ARC would be insulting. Also what about all the Western Force players that don’t make the Wallabies squad? Some will come back to the East but we can’t expect blokes to live half the year in Perth and half on the eastern seaboard.

Either way, John O’Neill, an avid reader of The Sideline Eye (haha) this is for you. We’re so happy you’re talking about re-introducing the ARC we’ve decided a few ways to do it and get close to breaking even.

Melbourne – placing a Super franchise in Melbourne means that a Melbourne ARC team will not be such a financial burden as it was last time around (the infrastructure will be there). Unlike last time where basically the entire playing roster and coaching staff had to re-locate their costing a heap.

North Sydney team over Central Coast – it was good that the ARC looked after the disenfranchised Central Coast in the form of ARC champions the Central Coast Rays. However this added greatly to the costs, the Rays were a combination side of sides on the north side of the bridge so instead of the Central Coast base them on the North Shore / Northern Beaches. (How you could not have a side properly representing the North Shore / Beaches in the first place is beyond Wally but more on that later).                              

TV deal – the standard of the last ARC was good and good enough for a broadcaster to want to show it (and not pay them to show it). This will be helped by making the scheduling of matches more TV friendly; Friday night game on FoxSports (to run against Nine’s Friday night footy), the usual Saturday afternoon game but on FoxSports (no league on Sat arvo so they’d like something to show live) and Sunday afternoon on ABC or OneHD, Channel 10. The final game wouldn’t be televised and the game can be played whenever the home side wants.

Accomodation – sorry but this has to be semi-professional and as far as possible the players are going to have to fly to and from interstate games on the day.

Flights – can QANTAS be pushed into being a top line sponsor? Even if the only contribution is paying flights it’ll be worth it.

Payment – Super rugby players and those on ARU contracts already get plenty of cash and would be playing club rugby for next to nothing anyway so do they need to be getting a heap of money for playing in the ARC? At least for the first few seasons they’d have to be pretty tight on paying players. Guys making the jump from first grade to this level would surely be more than happy enough just to get a slight better match fee than they get at club rugby along with the team kit!

Grounds – The Sideline Eye has written previously about playing quality rugby league grounds that would encourage the crowds and corporates. But if it is a matter of having a national comp or not (i.e. to save cash) nobody would care if games were being played at smaller venues. (i.e. Rat park instead of Brookvale oval, TG Milner or Granville park instead of Parramatta Stadium).

It CAN be done and as stated to death on this site, it needs to be done. More so now we have to fill out a 5^th side.

Cricket has its Sheffield Shield (and that don’t make no money) and to survive and prosper on provincial Super rugby level and at International level Australia needs its ARC.

SANZAR have finally reached an agreement for an expansion from 2011 onwards which in a nut shell means:

1.      16 rounds

2.      Teams to be split into three conferences (RSA, NZ, AUS) with teams playing teams in their own conference home and away as well as playing four of the five teams in the other two conferences.

3.      A 15^th team will be introduced playing in the Australian conference (yet to be named).

4.      A six-team three week semi-finals system whereby the top team from each country is guaranteed a possie.

5.      Three week bye during the June Tests

6.      Begins in Feb and ends around August

This is great news. While the Yarpies basically got everything they demanded (they have superior leverage thanks to having the biggest TV market) from an Aussie point of view it makes some important leaps forward.

Firstly it means that instead of having a ridiculously short competition it finally runs for a decent length of time allowing people to get into the tournament.

Having eight guaranteed home games (including 4 against sides in the Australian conference) means more gate revenue and more games on tele to watch.

The fact we’re guaranteed one spot in the semi’s means is obviously a huge plus!

The next question is the 5^th team to play in the Aussie conference which is no means decided. South Africa’s bizare request for it to be a South African team aside, it is coming down to Gold Coast, Western Sydney and Victoria.

Victoria is of course the only answer:

·         Super rugby is a provincial competition

·         GC or WS would pillage Reds and Waratahs support and forever ruin the fantastic century old rivalry between Queensland and NSW state rugby sides.

·         Melbourne = 4 million people, Western Sydney = 2 million people Gold Coast = 500,000 people (roughly)

·         There are plenty of ex-pat Kiwis and northern state refugees in Melbourne to support the side

·         If rugby leaves it any longer the Storm will finally cement a spot and the ship will have sailed

·         New rectangular stadium in Melbourne to be ready by 2011.

·         Victoria actually has a strong history of rugby going back decades and have produced many Wallabies such as Weary Dunlop and Rocky Elsom

·         Having a Victorian side means that rugby has a solid national pressence (WA, NSW, QLD, VIC, ACT)

·         GC and WS have teams, the Reds and the Waratahs, as The Sideline Eye has been banging on about for yonks, both sides need to be playing games outside Ballymore and SFS and show people they are the State teams.

It scares many a folk that John O’Neill is even talking about putting the team in GC or WS but The Sideline Eye strongly suspects Messiah John is playing the game. Subtly saying to Melbournians ‘don’t take the team for granted’ and to the GC and Western Sydney ‘we haven’t forgotten you’.

Let’s bloody well hope so.

The restructuring of the Super rugby competition will make or break rugby union in Australia.

Big call but it’s true.

Rugby is going backwards in Oz; crowds are down and TV audience is down. The standard of Super 14 this year is the worst it has ever been and the side with the biggest market share, NSW Waratahs, are a horrible team to watch.

All rugby fans would know that there is a big debate going on now between the SANZAR nations over what to do with an expanded series.

The South Africans are being portrayed as the recalcitrant side because they insist on keeping their Currie Cup. They want the competition to start in early Feb and end in time for their domestic competition to commence in July.

At least the Yarpies have a domestic competition to protect and good on them for doing it.

BUT getting back to the Super rugby restructure for a minute. Here are the principle issues; people seem to prefer watching their team play teams from the same country Australian crowds tend to be much better when Aussie sides play Kiwis rather than the Saffas.

Also, we need the Saffas more than they need us. Why? Because Super Sport television in South Africa provides a heap of money into the SANZAR coffers as they operate in the biggest market (there are around 50 million South Africans and they’re in the right time zone for Europe too).

O’Neill is talking about a Japanese club because he wants to tap into the potential Asian honey pot.

How can all these things be brought together?

Enter Wally’s grand proposal:

South Africa commence their Currie Cup in February (RSA Conference)

• Australia and New Zealand commence ‘Asia-Pacific’ tournament in March.
• In Asia-Pacific there are two conferences consisting of;
  • NSW, QLD, ACT, WA, VIC (no foreign player restrictions, focus on getting Argentineans and perhaps Pacific Islanders) and Tokyo (no Aussie players just Japanese players but also try and get American and Canadians.)
  • Auckland, Wellington, Crusaders, Highlanders, Chiefs and either a Pacific Islands team or a sixth New Zealand team.

• They play each other once in this conference
• They then play every other team once (including teams that were in their own conference again). This is a total of 16 games (8 home and 8 away).
• Then in late July early August a six or eight team finals series that includes the top two/three/four South African sides against the top Asia-Pacific sides.

Why it could work:

v     Hopefully keep the South Africans on board which means the TV rights will be worth a LOT more.

v     More local derbies (keep up the crowd numbers).

v     Very limited games against South African sides which aren’t as popular but when we do play them hopefully it’ll be rare enough to grab attention anyway.

v     Most regular season games will be within prime time or a couple of hours out either way. It’s hard to follow your team when they’re playing at 3am in the RSA.

v     Brings in a new market in Asia which could develop into a big earner in the long term.

v     Could bring in Argentineans and Pacific Island players from Europe thereby making it easier to eventually get them playing in an expanded Tri-Nations.

I said it could make or break rugby in Oz because rugby is looking poor at the moment, if officials don’t get this right, if we can’t give rugby a new lease of life and get more people tuning in and going through the gate we’ll be swamped by the other codes. 

A thrilling Test match overnight (well the second half at least) as Ireland took the Six Nations title and the Grand Slam (beating all five other teams) for the first time since 1948 and only the second time in history.

So what do we make of the past couple of months of the northern hemisphere’s finest?

At the beginning of the season there were two important themes for mine: firstly, can Wales back up their fantastic 2008 form (winning the Grand Slam and beating Australia) and show they are genuine contenders with the Southern hemisphere giants?

Second, who will make the Lions XV and do they have any hope of beating the Springboks in the rainbow nation?

Well on the first front Wales, despite a great win against England, showed they are not yet global force. Far from fast exciting rugby they displayed against the Wallabies last year the wheels fell off towards the end of the tournament.

Bad options under pressure lost them the winnable (but tough) game against Le Bleus at Stade de France while against Ireland last night they were unable to come up with a single five pointer.

Indeed for a team that needed to win by 13 points to steal the championship, why did they constantly go for penalty goals?

They have a dominant scrum and a back row that can capture good ball at the breakdown but seem unable to win the tight games (All Blacks last year, France and Ireland this year…Australia being the notable exception).

IRB World Player of the Year Shane Williams had some good touches but goes missing massively in games, barely gets his hands on the pill against the Irish and the French.

As for the champions, Ireland may not have played the most attractive rugby, particularly against England Ireland fell into the trap that has been evident in many of the Super teams this season; useless, pointless, aimless, terrible kicking.

However they have two inspirational, world class players in lock Paul O’Connoll and Brian O’Dristcoll. O’Connoll is an unbelievable talent, a brilliant lineout player and a tough tight five who leads from the front. Brian O’Dristcoll was also sensational; hard as nails in defence, coming up with some pivotal backline play and twice coming into the messy ruck and bashing his way over the opposition forwards for crucial tries in two different games.

Ireland and Wales both have the ability to be up there with the Springboks and the All Blacks. If Ireland can build on their superior line-out and match it in the forwards they stand a chance moving towards 2011. The big asterisk on that one is that O’Gara, undoubtedly a kicking ‘stand-off’ needs to unleash some of his impressive backs in O’Dristcoll, Kearney and the speedster Tommy Bowe.

As for England, despite officially coming second (due to superior points difference, France, England and Wales all lost two matches) are a mess. At one point the men in white had conceded 10 yellow cards in just four games.

The sin binning machine developed from the fact England were desperate and often quite terrible and resorted to negative rugby. It was negative rugby in terms of their playing style, the many professional fouls and rough tactics (especially against Ireland).

France proved to any who still doubted that they are the Italy of rugby; capable of beating anyone on their day but equally be woeful the next.

So there you have it! Plenty of action, some great games and some terribly dull, kicking orientated rubbish us south of the equator usually associate with the Six Nations.

Next post: Lions tour.

There was a nice little to and fro with Wally’s great pal Mad Dave Weiner today about the Wallabies plan to play the Barbarians in June this year… oh and Sonny Bill Williams is playing.

Mad Dave reckons the match is a ‘waste of time,’ that Messiah John O’Neill wants fans ‘to turn up to watch penalty kicks in a match of little to no significance.’ 

He continues:

“As Laurie Daley pointed out, shouldn’t the league fraternity revel in the fact that a league convert is still needed in NSW to spark up interest in a Rugby contest? But all this misses the real question to be asked!  

Where the hell is a Barbarian from anyway? Of course the answer is nowhere, a bunch of nomads brought together for the sake of tradition, an exhibition contest that might, hopefully, be worth savouring for the rare treat of attacking rugby. But it’s not exactly a full blown all-star match, so what’s the point. It’s a great gimmick” 

At this point The Sideline Eye took offence and ordered men to the ramparts and the loading up of the trebuchet.

A certain recalcitrant fly shrieked:

 “Clearly you don’t understand the nature of the Barbarian fixture which rather than a stunt or a gimmick which you lazily suggest (lazy as you didn’t bother to read up on where it actually originates from). Ba Ba’s fixtures began in 1890, yes quite a while before league raided rugby’s best talent to ’spark up interest’ (to use your Laurie Daley quote out of context) in the new sport.

Saying the Ba Ba’s game doesn’t mean anything shows ignorance in the importance the fixture has played in rugby for over a century… You wouldn’t have said the game was meaningless if you’d seen the Ba Ba v Wallabies game from the spring tour last year. Where George Smith bashed his body against the likes of Jerry Collins and Skulk Burger and in the after match interview, head covered in blood told the interviewer how important the game was for Australia to win… 

The hypocrisy of leaguies to talk about boycotting the game is hilarious not only because a) as if leaguies go to Ra Ra games anyway and b) you’re just helping rugby get free promotion for this game. The game is more about getting an exciting fixture in the June Test window because the Home Nations will be in South Africa as part of the British and Irish Lions side and we’ll be stuck with an ordinary Italian outfit.

And Sonny Bill? He’s a talented player and there is widespread interest in how he goes in a new code. Will he put bums on seats? Of course and good on rugby for thinking outside the square to get him out here.” 

So yes nothing brings out robust debate like sport, especially when the dividing line is between the rugby codes. But as harsh as wallythefly’s comments seem it was done in good humour. 

The point of course is this; the league commentators are bemoaning it as a stunt where the more correct term would be a smart, strategic move by the ARU to put a spark in the usually dull June Test window.  The Barbarians game meaningless? Watch it this June (which will have a dramatically increased TV audience no doubt) and come back and say the 30 men on the pitch thought it was ‘meaningless’. 

To see the full debate see Mad Dave’s blog here.

1. Andy Sheridan (ENG)    2. Dimitri Szarzewski (FRA)     3. Lional Faure (FRA)

                        4. Vicktor Matfield (RSA)                 5.  Ali Williams (NZ)

6.Skulk Burger (RSA)                                                                        7. Richie McCaw (NZ)

                                                  8. Andy Powell (WAL)

  9. Mike Blair (SCO)

            10. Dan Carter (NZ)

                        12. Matt Giteau (AUS)

                                    13. Stirling Mortlock (AUS)

 11. Shane Williams (WAL)                                                     14. Bryan Habana (RSA)

                                                  15. Juan Martín Hernández (ARG)

Res:

George Smith (AUS)

Bakkies Botha (RSA)

Steven Moore (AUS)

Tony Woodcock (NZ)

Moses Rauluni (FIJ)

Mils Muliaina (NZ)

Jean de Villiers (RSA)

The ‘autumn internationals’ or the Spring tours depending on which way your toilet flushes, were of added significance this year as the IRB rankings at the end of November were used to decide the pooling for the RWC in 2011.

The race for a top four (band 1) finish was particularly important as it meant you wouldn’t be in the same pool with another rugby giant (battle between Wales, England, France and Argentina for the fourth spot to avoid a pool match between the SANZAR nations which were cemented in the top three).

Also there were teams desperately wanting to be in the second band of nations so they wouldn’t be forced in a pool with a top nation like New Zealand and a second ‘band’ nation like France (which happened to Tonga). Ireland’s win over Argentina two weeks ago meant they avoided this fate while Scotland’s recent poor form meant they were confided to the third band and will now face England and Argentina in the pool stages, making qualification to the next round very tough.

So the IRB rankings and the draw as announced December 1

1. NZ
2. South Africa
3. Australia
4. Argentina
5. Wales
6. England
7. France
8. Ireland:
9. Scotland
10. Fiji
11. Italy
12. Tonga

Now the merit in using rankings so far out from the RWC (unfair on teams that will have improved and too fair on those that are on the way down) is questionable. However, The Sideline Eye suggests that using the rankings from a set date for the WC draw (however far away it is) can be used to greater affect.

This year in a bid to make Internationals more interesting (and to make sure touring sides send their best squads so we don’t get stuck with English and French B teams like usual) it has been proposed to hold a ‘World Series’ of sorts.

Played over two years, it would involve a points system for internationals played over the two year period included Six Nations and some Tri Nations games as well as Tests between nations of the two competitions (plus Argentina).

This sounds like it could work, but imagine how much more interesting this ‘World Series’ would be if it was connected to the seedings of the World Cup! I’d have a prize for the team that came first but also a team that dramatically changed its ranking (and make prize winnings to be spent on junior development in that country).

The IRB proposal was for a final at Wembly or Twikkers but perhaps instead the winner could play a one off match against a World XV (or Barbarians outfit) in a ‘developing market’, Dubai, Tokyo, Denver or wherever (read lots of cash for the IRB to be put back into the game).

The competition would be much more interesting if island nations were included unlike in the IRB proposal, but as a combined team (who celebrated their first ever win against Italy this tour).

It would be much easier to run if Argentina and the Pacific Islands were including in an expanded Tri-Nations tournament (gets southern hemisphere match ups out of the way and makes it possible for the northern hemisphere teams to play all the southern hemisphere sides).

If the Lions tour was done in the year after the World Cup instead of in between Cups this ‘World Series’ could easily be played in between the Cups and over just one calendar year. This would allow the RWC draw to be done right after the World Series was completed and give tournament organisers a year and a half to organise and promote the thing (this was the reason for doing the WC draw three years before 2011).